A little progress. At least the ODE is solvable now. I used the strategy of row operations to get rid of the elements with low (or zero) time constants from as many rows as possible. This is the code (click on "view raw" below the code box to see it in a new window):

So for a circuit:

The matrices are transformed as follows:

Original matrices are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

e=

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1

0.0 0.0 0.0001 0.0001

0.0 0.1 0.0001 0.2001

a=

10000000.0 0.0 10000000.0 10000000.0

0.0 20.0 0.0 10.0

10000000.0 0.0 10000010.1 10000000.1

10000000.0 10.0 10000000.1 10000020.1

b=

1.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

These are manipulated to:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

e=

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1

0.0 0.0 0.0001 0.0001

0.0 0.1 0.0001 0.2001

a=

10000000.0 0.0 10000000.0 10000000.0

0.0 20.0 0.0 10.0

0.0 0.0 10.0999999996 0.0999999996275

0.0 10.0 0.0999999996275 20.0999999996

b=

1.0

0.0

-1.0

-1.0

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

With this the ODE solves with a time step of 10.0e-6 seconds. However, the stiff equation still is not solved satifsfactorily because of the entire row of large resistances. The way, loop current i1 would be calculated would be:

i1=(-10000000.0*i3-10000000.0*i4)/10000000.0

This would cause i1 to be of the same order as the other loop currents as this reduces to:

i1=-i3-i4

Which is wrong.

So this makes me wonder, why are the off-diagonal terms present in that case? Why not just do:

i1=u/10000000.0

Seems like that might be the solution. Because all I need is the sum total of all the resistance between the input signal in the loop to give me the approximate current. But this is then eventually ONLY the approximate current.

## No comments:

## Post a Comment